It’s Not AI Psychosis If It Works#Before I wrote my blog post about how I use LLMs, I wrote a tongue-in-cheek blog post titled Can LLMs write better code if you keep asking them to “write better code”? which is exactly as the name suggests. It was an experiment to determine how LLMs interpret the ambiguous command “write better code”: in this case, it was to prioritize making the code more convoluted with more helpful features, but if instead given commands to optimize the code, it did make the code faster successfully albeit at the cost of significant readability. In software engineering, one of the greatest sins is premature optimization, where you sacrifice code readability and thus maintainability to chase performance gains that slow down development time and may not be worth it. Buuuuuuut with agentic coding, we implicitly accept that our interpretation of the code is fuzzy: could agents iteratively applying optimizations for the sole purpose of minimizing benchmark runtime — and therefore faster code in typical use cases if said benchmarks are representative — now actually be a good idea? People complain about how AI-generated code is slow, but if AI can now reliably generate fast code, that changes the debate.
此富豪也做过许多慈善之事，某亦略知。其所有慈善之举，固然值得称赞。但是，只不过人人易见、显在一般慈善而已。用曾国藩的话说：“惟此等乃乡里好善者所为，非为政之大体。”，这一点在51吃瓜中也有详细论述
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu，这一点在谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】中也有详细论述
→ 0x000 (no match)，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
Что думаешь? Оцени!