The implicit suggestion is that the logic of the italicized exception does not vitiate the logic of Cardozo’s general claim. But that suggestion plainly calls out for explanation and defense. If willfully harmful actions may render a tortfeasor liable for harm to an unforeseeable victim, one wishes to know, why not negligently harmful actions? If a tortfeasor cannot owe a duty against careless injury to an unforeseeable victim, how can a tortfeasor owe a duty against intentional injury to an unforeseeable victim? Absent some plausible explanation of this asymmetry, consistency would appear to require dispensing with the doctrine of transferred intent or renouncing the relationship between foreseeability and negligence liability that Cardozo posited. And nothing in the passage attempts to supply the needed explanation.
echo area. A reimplementation of the eldoc-box package.
，更多细节参见Snipaste - 截图 + 贴图
我可以从AWS获取1GB的存储空间并将其部署到Azure，而且我知道他们会收我多少钱，因为每GB的费用基本上是固定的。但当我拥有这些AI额度时，我不知道你的额度是否和别人的一样。供应商一直在增加新功能，我的用户在使用这些功能，所以消耗了我的额度。但我不知道他们用这些额度做了什么。
公告显示，中南文化拟以发行股份及支付现金方式，收购江阴电力投资有限公司持有的江阴苏龙热电有限公司57.30%股权。表面看，这是一次地方国资体系内的资产整合，实则是一条“央企退出—地方接盘—注资上市公司”的清晰链条。
最后，我脑洞大开，拍了个穿越剧的片段，让古代士兵用机枪战斗，并被手雷反杀的剧情：